their advice is expert evidence, admissible in Admiralty Courts, on all issues of fact about seamanship. In the Australia (2) Lord Dunedin deprecated putting to assessors a question that is tantamount to asking them whether they would find for the plaintiff or the defendant and repudiated the idea that the views of the assessors in an appeal court are entitled to more respect than those of assessors below. These appeals filed by Tata Steel arise out of S.  The grievance in this appeal is that though the application of the law laid down by this court in State of Orissa v.
nOn the other hand, Mr. This last (1)  INSC 21;  3 S. In the set of appeals pertaining to TISCO, the first appeal is Civil Appeal No. Punnan’s story regarding the lambardars has been falsely introduced by the police, also that both courts have rejected the evidence about the dying declaration. Legislature passed the U. ” We have taken into consideration the fact that the High Court considers that the portion of Mst. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
If before dismissing an employee the employer has held a proper domestic enquiry and has proceeded to pass the impugned order as a result of the said enquiry, all that the authority can do is to enquire whether the conditions prescribed by s. In view of the limited nature and extent of the enquiry permissible under s. ; and, has an application been made as prescribed by the proviso? 33(2)(b) all that the authority can do in dealing with an employer’s application is to consider whether a prima facie case for according approval is made out by him or not.
The Tribunal considered the contentions raised by the appellant against the respondents’ demands, took into account awards or agreements between employers and their employees in comparable concerns and made its award. TISCO therefore claims entitlement to refund on the excess royalty paid by it for this period. Has an enquiry been held an provided by the standing order? ” The decision of the case, however, rests entirely with the court and even Barrister in Chandigarh High Court purely nautical matters the court is not bound to follow the advice of assessors, but on questions of nautical science and skill great attention must obviously be paid to the opinion of the assessors since they are the only source of information on these points and some reason should be given for disregarding them.
The complaint against the appellant has not been lodged either before the Lokayukta or Upa lokayukta but the same was registered suo-moto at the Police Station attached to the Lokayukta and therefore, the procedure provided under the provisions of the Lokayukta Act was not required to be followed as contended by the learned senior counsel on behalf of the appellant Patil, the learned senior counsel on behalf of the respondents has rebutted the aforesaid legal contentions urged on behalf of the appellant, stating that the Inspector of Police of the Lokayukta has taken note of the news item published Top Lawyer in Chandigarh the Newspaper on 28.
After following the procedure prescribed therein, the State Government finally published the scheme on June 23, 1956. The other set of appeals pertaining to Tata Steel consists of four appeals. In regard to privilege leave the Tribunal has ordered that leave should be granted to the staff members covered by the reference as follows: 9016-17/2014 and are directed against a common judgment and order dated 12th March, 2014 passed by the Jharkhand High Court in W.
Do the standing orders justify the order of dismissal? We have followed the same principles with regard to the advice of the assessors given Barristers in Chandigarh this case and we shall refer to such advice in the course of this judgment when it has a bearing on the questions at issue before us. Have the wages for the month been paid as required by the proviso? The assessors in an appeal court are not substituted for those previously consulted; they are additional to them; and if one adviser or two advisers are to be preferred, it is because in the judgment of the court the advice given is such as, in itself, is the more acceptable.
Act on April 24, 1955, whereunder the State Government was authorized to frame a scheme of nationalization of motor transport. 33(2)(b) and the proviso are satisfied or not. Despite that, we agree with the learned Sessions Judge that Mst. 1504/2009 it is also clear that as far as Tata Steel is concerned, Washery Grade IV coal that it extracts needs to be beneficiated to make it usable in the steel industry and the controversy is limited to the issue of payment of royalty – whether it is payable on raw or unprocessed or ROM coal at the pit-head or it is payable on processed Steel Grade coal.
2012 in The Times of India, English edition. 2011 in ‘Vijaya Karnataka’ a Kannada daily, which was repeated on 3. 303/2004 filed by TISCO against the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2002 passed by the Jharkhand High Court.  (hereafter SAIL) has been accepted by the High Court, namely, that royalty is chargeable [in accordance with Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (the MMDR Act)] on the quantity of coal extracted at the pit-head, yet the refund Quashing of FIR or Criminal Complaint Law Firm in Chandigarh excess royalty paid by TISCO for the period from 10th August, 1998 (the date of the decision in SAIL) till June 2002 [about Rs.
There can be no question of any appeal from one set of assessors to another. 2012 in ‘Bangalore Mirror’ and on 05.