66 (2) be moved and it can then direct that such reference be made. 2003 was passed, wherein there was a difference of opinion between the Judicial and Technical Member. It shall be the general duty of the Commission to take, in consultation with the Universities or other bodies concerned, all such steps as it may think fit for the promotion and co-ordination of University education and for the determination and maintenance of standards of teaching, examination and research in Universities, and for the purpose of performing its functions under this Act, the Commission may- inquire into the financial needs of Universities By making a single I contradiction’, the accused places the entire statement in the hands of the prosecution to explain away everything with its assistance.
For the purpose of this Sub-Clause: 5: Increase or Decrease of Price of Specified Materials Increase or decrease of price of specified materials will be adjusted by either an addition to or a deduction to or a deduction from the Contract Prices. Then again the appellant’s claim for rehabilitation 946 in the earlier proceedings has also been satisfactorily explained by Mr. 307/2004 has been filed by the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) against the same judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2002.
66 (1) of the Act and if the Tribunal does not make such reference the High Court can under s. The other set of appeals pertaining to Tata Steel consists of four appeals. “] [No rule made or purporting to have been made, with retrospective effect, under section 25 of the principal Act before the commencement of this Act shall be deemed to have been invalid or ever to have been invalid merely on the round that such rule was made with retrospective effect and accordingly every such rule and every action taken or thing done thereunder shall be as valid and effective as if the provisions of section 25 of the principal Act, as amended by this Act, were in force at all material times when such rule was made or action or thing was taken or done.
The respondents have placed considerable reliance on the statement filed by Mr. Since his opinion was in favour of the appellants on merits, he did not go into the time bar issue. After hearing, an order dated 31. The submission is that after the decision in SAIL the Government of India issued a notification dated 25th September, 2000 inserting Rule 64B and Rule 64C in the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (hereafter MCR) and as a result of this, Run-Protection of Life and Liberty Advocate in Chandigarh-Mine (ROM) minerals, after being processed in the leased area are exigible to royalty on the processed mineral.
And then a reference can be made by the Tribunal to the High Court under s. Every rule and every regulation made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session, or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree Best Counsel in Chandigarh making any modification child custody lawyer in Chandigarh the rule or regulation or both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may, be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.
As per the order of the Judicial Member, the Defibrillator manufactured by the appellant could be used for internal use and therefore they are eligible to the benefit of the notification. 1504/2009 it is also clear that as far as Tata Steel is concerned, Washery Grade IV coal that it extracts needs to be beneficiated to make it usable in the steel industry and the controversy is limited to the issue of payment of royalty – whether it is payable on raw or unprocessed or ROM coal at the pit-head or it is payable on processed Steel Grade coal.
One wonders if the legislature intended such a result, for it is too great a price for the accused to pay for too small a right. The Technical Member while admitting that the Defibrillator could be used for internal use in rare circumstances when the heart is open and the paddles for internal use are fixed in the Defibrillators as there is a build in mechanism in the Defibrillator for making it usable as internal Defibrillator during an open heart surgery, however denied the benefit of the notification on the ground that only Defibrillators used with pace maker and which is implantable is eligible to the benefit of the notification.
The appellant once again filed the Appeal before the CESTAT, Bangalore. These appeals filed by Tata Steel arise out of S. 9016-17/2014 and are directed against a common judgment and order dated 12th March, 2014 passed by the Jharkhand High Court in W. It is contended that these rules were, unfortunately, not brought to the notice of the High Court and that the decision rendered by the High Court accepting the law laid down in SAIL is incorrect.