365 per Light Displacement Tonnage. The basis of NRI Legal Services disagreement as is evincible from his judgment is that the curative petition that was decided by a Bench of three senior-most Judges of this Court on NRI Legal Services 21st July, 2015, was not appositely constituted as required under Rule 4 of Order XLVIII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 (for short, ‘the Rules’). 53-A of the Act it was still null and void and inoperative as it violated the principles of natural justice and (4)that the order made was mala fide inasmuch as it had been passed with an ulterior object of taking away the control of the municipality from the lndependent Party which was in a majority and that this was in accordance with the policy adopted by the State Government of superseding or suspending municipalities which were not controlled by the Congress Party.
He founded this argument on the NRI Legal Services position that the wife and the son of the Princerespondents I and 2-have no present interest in his estate. Vide this Notification, goods were exempted from whole of the duty or excise leviable thereon as specified in the Schedule to the Act falling under the same Heading Nos. 255 of 1984 could not be said to be sufficient notice for the institution of the suit in O. (3) even if the notification be held to be under s. Sikri that though the word ” sale ” has a definite sense in the Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930, it has a wider sense in law other than that relating to sale of goods, and that, on the principle that words conferring legislative powers should be construed in their broadest amplitude, it would be proper to attribute that sense to it in Entry (1) (1937) 111 A.
(3) It is next contended by Mr. He NRI Legal Services rightly NRI Legal Services pointed out, and there was no controversy between the parties before us, that the added defendants do not come within the purview of the words ” who ought to have been joined “, which apparently have reference to necessary parties in the sense that the suit cannot be effectively disposed of without their presence on the record. In this connection, he pointed out that r. The NRI Legal Services Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUBBA RAO J.
Provided that the said goods have been obtained from breaking of ships, boats and other floating structures on which has been paid the duty of customs leviable under the First Schedule to the customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) at the rate of Rs. Appollo Candle Company Limited the question arose as to whether s. As further proof of the mala fides of Res- pondent No. The general scheme of the Companies Act is that the Court should have complete control of all proceedings in winding up and it was therefore urged that the official liquidator was not authorised to do anything either without the sanction of the Court or without its directions.
Section 179 deals with the powers of official liquidator. 1 was expelled from the Congress Part for six years in about March 1957 because he stood as an Independent 1474 candidate for election to the Lower House of Parliament in the 1957 elections. -This appeal by certificate tinder Art. In holding that it was not, the Privy Council observed: On the same day, another Notification No. , disagreed with Anil R. 133 of the Customs Regulation Act of 1879 of New South Wales which conferred a power on the Governor to impose tax on certain articles of import was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative powers.
The learned Attorney-General strenuously argued that it cannot be asserted in this case that the presence of the added defendantsrespondents 1 and 2-before the court was necessary in order to enable the court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit. We cannot agree with the said contention. Their expectancy of succession to the estate of the Prince does not clothe them with any right vested or contingent to intervene in this action.
After referring to Rule 4(1) and (2) of the said Rules and the term ‘judgment’ as defined in Order I Rule 2(k) of the Rules, the learned Judge has held thus: 255 of 1984 can be said to be constructive notice. NRI Legal Services The High Court considered that the object of the Section is the advance of justice and securing of public good. -This – appeal by Special Leave against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Patiala and East Punjab States Union raises an interesting question pertaining to the Law of NRI Legal Services Preemption.
09 on the fulfillment of the condition contained in proviso to this Notification, which reads as follows: 1,035/- per Light Displacement Tonnage and also the additional duty leviable thereon under Section 3 of the said Customs Tariff Act at the rate of Rs. 133 (1) (a) of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Patna setting aside those of the Subordinate Judge, Gaya, in a suit for redemption of an usufructuary mortgage.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUBBA RAO J. 1, the State Government, it was alleged that Radheshyam Khare appellant No. The High Court of Karnataka in the Second Appeal had dismissed the contention on the ground that the notice issued in the suit NRI Legal Services O.